Mediation
Links can be determined between mediation and representation in
that representation present something, whilst mediation is able to re-
construct a text, changing its meanings and form suited to the objectives of
the media institution. Mediation can be defined as the process in which
communication is made between the text and consumers; mediation actively
creates meaning through a text in order to gain preferred and dominant readings
from its audience. However, the mediation process does not always gain the
ideal reading intended for the media text – texts are and can be decoded
differently by its audience. Meanings and interpretations taken from a mediated
message are ‘decoded’ by an individual in a way that makes sense to them, this
can be influenced and depend on that person’s personal experiences and cultural
background. Mediation is the method in which mediated messages of texts are
carried from one place to another (Bennett, Slater, 2006). The power of
mediation is apparent in the effect that it can take a piece of information or
image and completely change its meanings in accordance with what media
companies prefer the audience to perceive about it and accept as truth. ‘The
processes and relations of mediation are processes and relations of re-
contextualization, which specifically involve relations between the field of
media and other social fields’ (Lassen, Strunck, Vestergaard, 2006: 28).
Recontextualization is the process in which alternative or additional meaning
is taken from its original context, ultimately changing what it may have
originally standed for. Recontextualization changes the way in which a text is
communicated whilst implying a change of meaning. The media will use
contextualization to take a word or social event for example and use the
surrounding notions and concepts in ‘mediating it’’ to recreate their ideal
meaning before sharing it with the world.
Though mediation is used as a way of forming shared understandings
between the text and consumer – ‘our self- identity and cultural consciousness
are inextricably intertwined with the media of communication’ (Ruben, Lievrouw,
1990: 21). Consumers aren’t able to detach or separate their thoughts about
themselves and others from mediated communication. Subconsciously, our values
and perceptions of the world are based off of representations in the media
surrounding people and society. The media does this through producing their own
version of reality – changes are made to the form of the text in creating their
desired message ready for audience consumption.
Insight is given into the strength of the media through mediation
(Kember, Zylinksha, 2012).This is evident in the sense that the method of
mediation is performed and present in all media previous to audience
consumption. Media platforms wish to impose a particular idea or opinion in receiving
a reciprocated reaction from its audience. In order to gain these favoured
responses, all media must consider the selection and construction before
broadcasting the media text – they look into the social and cultural forces
that inform and influence them in the process of mediation (Howley, 2010: 130).
Mediation considers cultural politics, social beliefs and the tastes and
perceptions of audiences. The selection and construction are a major part of
the mediation process. ‘Selection’ is concerned with the action in which media
organisations select the text or image from a range of alternatives; it has
been specifically chosen to work accordingly with how they wish to construct
it. ‘Selection’ is significant in its ability to tell audiences something in
particular about the social world. It considers the surrounding social factors
of the text before choosing it from a range of others, in doing this the
selection process leaves out information the media organisation does not intend
on using and selects the text with the knowledge that it needs to correspond
with how they intend the audience to receive it - the construction needs to
work accordingly with the selection in communicating this reality or message.
References
Bennett, P, Slater, J, Wall, P (2006) A2 Media Studies:
The Essential Introduction. New York: Routledge.
Howley, K (2010) Understanding Community Media. London: SAGE Publications.
Kember, S, Zylinska, J (2012) Life After New Media: Mediation as a Vital Process. London: The MIT Press.
Lassen, I, Strunck, J, Vestergaard, T (2006) Mediating Ideology in Text and Image: Ten Critical Studies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Ruben, B, Lievrouw, L (1990) Mediation, Information, and Communication. New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.
Howley, K (2010) Understanding Community Media. London: SAGE Publications.
Kember, S, Zylinska, J (2012) Life After New Media: Mediation as a Vital Process. London: The MIT Press.
Lassen, I, Strunck, J, Vestergaard, T (2006) Mediating Ideology in Text and Image: Ten Critical Studies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Ruben, B, Lievrouw, L (1990) Mediation, Information, and Communication. New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.
Comments
Post a Comment